You hold two or three of them.
Nobody can tell you what you actually own.
It is a normal, common situation. It is also the one nothing lets you read.
Holding several of these companies makes sense. Each has its own team, its own history, its own way of working, and plenty of serious investors hold two, three, sometimes more.
The trouble is that their contents overlap. The same company can sit inside two of them with nothing telling you so. A sector can weigh far more once the lines are added up than it does in any one of them alone. And the part of what you hold that cannot be sold overnight is written nowhere. None of these companies can tell you: each knows only itself. Your account statement will not tell you either: it shows you lines, not what is inside them.
We add up what they own, and we let you see through. You choose the companies, you choose their weights, you choose the date. We rebuild what it comes to once they are put together.
We add up by broad categories: what can be sold easily and what cannot, the nature of each holding, the sector. We go down to the name of a company when we are sure it is the same one on both sides, and we stop when we are not. Whatever we could not break down stays visible as such: we never spread it over the rest to make the total come out round.
This is not an allocation built for you. We do not know your goals, your horizon, or the rest of what you hold. We show what your selection contains, and nothing else.
No combined figure, and here is why
These companies do not measure their weights against the same whole. Adding up shares that do not refer to the same denominator would give a number that adds up neatly and means nothing. We do not compute it, and we do not show it greyed out either: a grey total is still a total, and a reader reads it.
Bases found: of the published portfolio, of an unestablished base.
Start from a selection that is already set up.
This view is yours. The page address replays it exactly, and an account keeps it under a name, ready at the next published reporting date.
You hold several. See them as one.
One. Try it before you commit anything.
You are torn between two of these companies. Or you wonder what a little more of one and a little less of the other would come to. Build it here, look at what it gives you, change the weights, start again. Nothing is bought, nothing is committed, nothing is passed on to anyone. You are rehearsing, before you play for real.
Two. Keep the view, and let it bring itself up to date.
The view you have just built will age: the companies publish, what they own changes, your weights do not. An account keeps your selection under a name and reads it again at the next published reporting date. You come back, and without redoing a thing you see whether your positions overlap and where your exposure concentrates.
Three. Soon, your own tools will read your figures here.
You have already pasted a table into a chat window to ask an assistant what it made of it. You re-pasted the columns by hand, fixed the dates, and you were not sure it had read all of it. We are preparing the opposite: your tools will come and read your portfolios and our data where they live, and answer you on your own figures, not on a general example.
In development. We will announce it as open on the day it is.
One word, to be clear. What these screens give you is a composition, not advice. An allocation built for you would call for your goals, your horizon, your tolerance for risk and the rest of what you own. We do not know them, we do not ask you for them, and we will never tell you to buy or to sell.
We do not promise you a better spread. We show you what you actually own, overlaps and concentrations included, and you judge for yourself. A salesman promises. We show.
Understand before you act. The rest is yours.
An address is enough. We send you a link that opens the door. No password.
The Opulion letter
One letter when a company page is published. Never more often.